Paradise Valley Legistar Banner
File #: 18-178    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Memo Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/19/2018 In control: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: Final action:
Title: Emerson Variance Reconsideration - 5739 N. Casa Blanca Drive (APN: 173-08-004A) Case No. BA-17-04
Attachments: 1. Report, 2. Vicinity & Aerial, 3. Application, 4. Narrative & Plans, 5. March 7th BofA Meeting Materials, 6. August 8, 2002 Letter & ROW Dedication Surveys, 7. Public Comment, 8. Public Comment 2, 9. Noticing Material - Reconsideration
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
TO: Chair and Board of Adjustment

FROM: Eva Cutro, Community Development Director
Paul Michaud, Senior Planner
George Burton, Planner

DATE: May 2, 2018

CONTACT:
Staff Contact
George Burton, 480-348-3525
End

AGENDA TITLE:
Title
Emerson Variance Reconsideration - 5739 N. Casa Blanca Drive (APN: 173-08-004A) Case No. BA-17-04
Body

RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation
Staff recommends Motion "A", a motion to deny the variance request to allow existing non-conforming fence walls to remain and encroach into the setbacks.

A. MOTION FOR DENIAL
I move for [denial] of Case No. BA-17-04, a request by the Carter W. Emerson Revocable Trust, property owner of 5739 N. Casa Blanca Drive; for a variance from the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIV, Walls and Fences, to allow existing non-conforming fence walls to remain and encroach into the setbacks.

Reasons for Denial:
I find that the variance requested does not meet the variance criteria

B. MOTION FOR APPROVAL
I move for [approval] of Case No. BA-17-04, a request by the Carter W. Emerson Revocable Trust, property owner of 5739 N. Casa Blanca Drive; for a variance from the Zoning Ordinance, Article XXIV, Walls and Fences, to allow existing non-conforming fence walls to remain and encroach into the setbacks. The variance shall be in compliance with the submitted plans and documents:
1. The Narrative, dated March 26, 2018 and prepared by Rose Law Group;
2. The Alta/NSPS Land Title Survey, prepared by Land Development Group and dated April 17, 2017; and
3. The Site Plan, prepared by Blochbeger Design and dated September 20, 2017.

Reasons for Approval:
I find that there are special circumstances, applicable to only the subject lot, meeting the variance criteria.
Background

BACKGROUND
Board of Adjustment Discussion
The Board of Adjustment reviewed and denied this variance request at the January 3, 2018 meeting. Then, on March 7, 2018, the Board reviewed and granted a motion to reconsider this variance request...

Click here for full text